Mp3 gain equalizer7/5/2023 ![]() ![]() If the mastering is terrible and the EQ is totally wrong, I fix it manually. Where things do sound different, it's not normally a problem. Quote What do I do? I have a rough idea of what sounds "right", and thankfully most things do. Replay Gain fixed the volume difference problem gracefully, but now I have the equalization difference problem, and I can tell you that it's really a problem. When I play these songs I want them to sound uniform, like in a radio station. The music's genres are basically ROCK and POP. I have converted to MP3 about a 1000 CDs to select just the songs that I like. I have a bowling center where I constantly play music. Let me tell you what my final objective is… I never liked dynamic range compression, but maybe it's the answer for my problem. Is Multiband dynamic range compression simply the answer? That's a question that always makes me wonder. "How the music in a radio station sounds uniform?" However, that would be "using a sledgehammer to crack a nut" - you'd get the result you want, but you'd change the dynamics of the music as well as the EQ. Quote FWIW Multiband dynamic range compression does seem to "normalise" the EQ of most tracks that go through it - that's why everything on a single radio station usually sounds quite uniform, even though the individual CDs themselves do not. Maybe someone knows of some Auto EQ out there - I remember Pioneer including it on some stereos in the 1980s, so some DSP (at least to do it badly!) must be quite easy.ĮDIT: Anyone want to try multi-band ReplayGain by album? I suspect you'd need different target levels in each band - but if you could find some that worked well across a whole genre of music, then you mig the trance track, and it would sound terrible! But I would love to be proved wrong on this.ĮDIT: Anyone want to try multi-band ReplayGain by album? I suspect you'd need different target levels in each band - but if you could find some that worked well across a whole genre of music, then you might have a slightly useful tool! But it's easier to make things worse than to make things better, and it's easier to fix things to your own "taste" or to compensate for problems in your own audio system than it is to accurately improve the sound. What do I do? I have a rough idea of what sounds "right", and thankfully most things do. I'm not going to say it's impossible, because people used to say that it was impossible to do what replay gain does! In truth, Replay Gain is just less imperfect than most people assumed it could be - but it's far from perfect.Īny "Auto EQ" system I can imagine would also be far from perfect - and would make so many audible mistakes that it would be more annoying than helpful! It would insist on making the classical track have as much bass as the trance track, and it would sound terrible! But I would love to be proved wrong on this.įWIW Multiband dynamic range compression does seem to "normalise" the EQ of most tracks that go through it - that's why everything on a single radio station usually sounds quite uniform, even though the individual CDs themselves do not. Accepting that a Trance track should have more bass than a classical piece, but knowing that most Trance tracks should (probably) have a similar amount of bass, and that any that don't probably need a little correction. You want a process that doesn't mess all the music up or re-EQ everything, but fixes tracks which obviously have too much or too little of something. It's got nothing to do with what the actual songs are supposed to sound like - it's just the mastering of the CD. I'm assuming you mean this: Some songs have way more treble than others others have more bass others have more midrange. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |